I have been a big defender of Michael Jackson since the first allegation of 1993. A lot of people seem to think that if you are a strange / weird / eccentric person you are a child molester. People need to educate themselves about both cases.
I mean, what pedophile would only molest two kids? Especially since be has had over 500 something kids sleep over there. What pedophile would stop at 2 in the course of over 10 years? So you either believe:
1) Jackson is a molester but only molested two kids
2) Jackson is a molester but only 2 kids have come forward, despite the police intensively interviewing over 300 kids after the 1993 allegation and couldn’t find a single child who would accuse Mike also
This just came out yesterday apparently, the mom of the kid accusing Michael has a history of suing for money:
She was caught in 1998 shoplifting from J.C. Penney’s WITH HER SON (both had stolen goods on them, partners in crime hehe) and then after she was caught, she sued J.C. Penney claiming, among other things the guards sexually molested her and abused her son. J.C. Penney gave her over $100,000 to settle out of court.
Also, the father is very likely going to testify on Michael Jackson’s behalf, he has already said that she also accused him of sexual abuse to her and her son so she could win custody. This woman is friggin’ insane.
A month before the settlement, the boy’s mother had filed for divorce, beginning a bitter fight that would include criminal charges of abuse.
Mr Halpern said the father once showed him a script his wife had allegedly written for their children to use when they were questioned in a civil deposition.
“She wrote out all their testimony. I actually saw the script,” Halpern said. “I remember my client showing me, bringing the paperwork to me.”
The family’s past legal cases could be critical in the current molestation case, if Michael Jackson’s lawyer can show the mother or the accuser lacks credibility, said Leonard Levine, a defense attorney who specializes in sexual assault cases.
Michael Jackson aint gonna take this shit laying down, they are going to hopefully prove this woman is insane and take the poor kid away from her. It seems even Michael would be a better parent than this looney.
As for the 1993 case: educate yourself with this extensive article originally published in GQ
Turns out the boy never made any accusations until after he was given a powerful hypnotic drug, and only after the father had wrestled custody of the boy away from the mother. Interesting to note that the lawyer representing the dad in the 1993 case also represents this current accusation.
Also, there were taped conversations where the father says “Jackson is going down if I don’t get what I want”
And on top of it all, if you are a parent and really loved your kid, and really believe a person sexually abused your child..would you really take ANY sum of money rather than seeing the pervert thrown in jail to get ass-raped? Why take money and let the abuser go free to abuse other kids? Both these cases are about extortion.